<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are top domain names worth it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.borrowmybrain.com/2007/04/04/are-top-domain-names-worth-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.borrowmybrain.com/2007/04/04/are-top-domain-names-worth-it/</link>
	<description>Lee Semel's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brain</title>
		<link>http://www.borrowmybrain.com/2007/04/04/are-top-domain-names-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borrowmybrain.com/2007/04/04/are-top-domain-names-worth-it/#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>I also prefer 'catchy' domain anmes. But something like "search.com" would be totally awesome for type-in traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also prefer &#8216;catchy&#8217; domain anmes. But something like &#8220;search.com&#8221; would be totally awesome for type-in traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip James</title>
		<link>http://www.borrowmybrain.com/2007/04/04/are-top-domain-names-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borrowmybrain.com/2007/04/04/are-top-domain-names-worth-it/#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>A 'top' domain name neither bad nor good any more. Its about as useful as a Madison avenue headquarters address. Now, no one cares if you're based in a village, or have a made up name. 

I dont agree that its helps B2B or hinders B2C - ask wine.com. They are 10x the size of the nearest online wine retailer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A &#8216;top&#8217; domain name neither bad nor good any more. Its about as useful as a Madison avenue headquarters address. Now, no one cares if you&#8217;re based in a village, or have a made up name. </p>
<p>I dont agree that its helps B2B or hinders B2C - ask wine.com. They are 10x the size of the nearest online wine retailer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie Hecker</title>
		<link>http://www.borrowmybrain.com/2007/04/04/are-top-domain-names-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie Hecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 06:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.borrowmybrain.com/2007/04/04/are-top-domain-names-worth-it/#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>Top Domains are great for B2B plays. On the B2B Side, you trust a company with a good name that comes up high in google, you shouldn't but you do. An example, I own BootStrapper.com, people therefore think I am the expert BootStrapper (I Happened to have bootstrapped two companies) but there are plenty of consultants out there that have accomplished more than me BUT I have the brand and I can support it with action...B2B is good to have a good name.

On a consumer side it hurts more than helps. It is better to have a domain that can become verbed like googled or yahooed or can become a noun like Myspace. From a consumer perspective a single domain name isn't sexy, it will get you noticed once but will not sustain a brand. Better spend $10 and get a name with some zing that you can build buzz around than search.com...

Richie Hecker
www.BootStrapper.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top Domains are great for B2B plays. On the B2B Side, you trust a company with a good name that comes up high in google, you shouldn&#8217;t but you do. An example, I own BootStrapper.com, people therefore think I am the expert BootStrapper (I Happened to have bootstrapped two companies) but there are plenty of consultants out there that have accomplished more than me BUT I have the brand and I can support it with action&#8230;B2B is good to have a good name.</p>
<p>On a consumer side it hurts more than helps. It is better to have a domain that can become verbed like googled or yahooed or can become a noun like Myspace. From a consumer perspective a single domain name isn&#8217;t sexy, it will get you noticed once but will not sustain a brand. Better spend $10 and get a name with some zing that you can build buzz around than search.com&#8230;</p>
<p>Richie Hecker<br />
<a href="http://www.BootStrapper.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.BootStrapper.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
